listing — .
It's the source AI cites most for these searches that you're not on yet.
Ready-to-paste outreach email
Getting listed is the prerequisite, not a guarantee — AI can take a few weeks to pick up a new source, so we re-scan to check whether it actually moved your answers. And the “about 1 in ” rate is a band on a small sample, not a precise number.
We only read public AI answers and directory listings — never patient or client records, and we never touch any private data. On review-driven directories like , your standing also moves with reviews over time, so claiming the profile is the first step, not the whole job.
Not your share-of-voice % or a source's citation count.
AI sends about of these searches to a rival instead of you.
AI names you in of answers — it points locals to instead.
Each of those is a local who asked AI where to go — and heard a competitor's name, not yours.
This is your best single search — a narrower view than the “about 1 in answers” overall rate up top, which averages across all your searches. Both are true; they just count different things.
to climb · DIY ~10 min each, editor pitches
Your #1 fix is below — free, with every step. Premium opens your full fix kit.
Premium unlocks your full fix list, writes the outreach emails, and watches it for you.
Getting listed is the prerequisite, not a guarantee — AI can take a few weeks to pick up a new source, so we re-scan to check whether it actually moved your answers. And the “about 1 in ” rate is a band on a small sample, not a precise number.
We only read public AI answers and directory listings — never patient or client records, and we never touch any private data. On review-driven directories like , your standing also moves with reviews over time, so claiming the profile is the first step, not the whole job.
+ more · DIY, editor pitches
“A website AI trusts” = a site AI pulls from when it answers these searches — getting listed there is how you start showing up.
What does “good” look like here? Even the most-recommended in , , owns only of the conversation — no business is named every time. So you don't need a perfect score; getting into the running is realistic, and that's what the fixes do.
expose which local sources they cite per question, so the source-level fixes are read off those. Premium also tracks — plus Copilot & Grok as they roll out.
Score = the share of sampled AI answers that name you — of here (). Each of prompts was asked × per engine because AI answers vary run-to-run; the rank shown is the best we saw across those runs, not a single saved answer.Each of prompts was asked once per engine; the rank shown is where AI placed you in that answer.
Create your free account to see your full breakdown
who's beating you · where AI looks · your fix list — and we'll save this scan
Enter a valid email to unlock your breakdown.
A free account saves this scan and turns on a weekly re-scan you can opt into. Google syncs your saved scans across devices.
No credit card. No spam. We only read public AI answers — never your private records.
The fixes are yours free. Premium re-runs this scan weekly, emails you the day a rival passes you, and hands you the ready-to-send outreach emails — monitoring and defense, not pay-to-fix.
Your baseline, saved
This scan is tied to your account automatically.
Weekly auto re-scan
We email you what actually changed between two scans you ran — a real before/after, never an invented trend.
Rival-overtake alert
Know the day a competitor passes you in AI answers.
Pro active — weekly re-scan on. We'll alert you the day a rival passes you.
You've got the essentials
Above you have your score, what it means, and your #1 move this week. Use "See the full breakdown" on your score above to open every search, every source, and who's beating you.
Search coverage
Across the things locals actually ask AI, here's where you land.
Buckets reflect your best result per search. "Won" = top 3 in ≥1 of runs — AI answers vary, so treat it as a snapshot.Buckets reflect where AI ranked you. "Won" = top 3; treat it as a snapshot of this scan.
Which searches name you, and on which AI
In plain words: a green cell means AI named you for that search; a red one means it didn't. You're named on just searches — every red cell is a question a rival is answering instead of you.
Each cell = how often you appeared (and your best rank). Click any cell for a sample answer we captured for that prompt.
| What locals ask | ⏳ n/a | 🔒 Premium |
|---|---|---|
|
🔒
|
queried this scan · why this matters ▾
🔒 Premium also tracks — and Copilot & Grok as they roll out.
Coverage compounds: AI assistants don't invent local picks — they read them off the same published best-of lists and directories (), and those lists are cited across assistants. So getting onto them compounds, not only the ones we measured.
Google Maps local pack
The 3 businesses Google shows for " near me" — the one honest geo signal.
We email you the day a rival overtakes you — and surface a fresh fix the moment a new list starts citing your competitors.
So you always have a next move — the part of staying recommended you can't watch by hand.
Your latest weekly re-scan shows (or whoever's nearest) appearing in more of AI's answers for your searches than before. The list that moved is one you're not on yet — your suggested next fix is one tap away.
A format preview with your current rival's name — Pro sends it only when a real re-scan detects the change.
Our honesty rule: we only ever report what a real re-scan found — never an invented alert, change, or score.
• Your score may hold steady week to week — that's normal, and it's not the reason to stay; the alerts are.
• Doing this by hand means re-running ~ searches and re-checking every source yourself each week — Pro does that for you.
• Pro watches for a rival overtaking you, or a new source starting to cite you — you'd get an email the moment a real re-scan detects it.
The baseline we watch
Each re-scan adds a bar.
Your pitch tracker: the work between scans
ProGetting on a best-of list isn't one click — you pitch an editor and wait, and a polite follow-up at the right time is what actually lands the spot. A live worklist of what to chase and when, between scans.
Timing is a general editorial norm, not a promise — driven by what you mark done in Sources & Fixes, never an invented reply.
Mark more fixes “Pitched” or “Live” in Sources & Fixes and they join this list.
Nothing in flight yet.
In Sources & Fixes, tap a fix to Pitched once you've emailed the editor — it'll appear here with a follow-up reminder so the spot doesn't slip while you wait.
Your weekly digest
Premium · weeklyIt lands in your inbox every week — you don't log in or run anything. The headline is one number: how many of the lists AI leans on you're now on.
↓ This preview updates as you mark fixes live in Sources & Fixes — that's the part that changes week to week.
- • Client update from : here's where stands in AI search this week — forward this digest as-is, it's branded to you.
- • You moved of fixes live this week — you're now listed on . (Being listed is the prerequisite; your re-scan re-measures whether AI named you.)
- • No fixes marked live yet. Your fastest win is still open: .
- • still open.
- • Baseline from your last scan: AI named you in about of answers ( of ); still leads share of voice at . Your weekly re-scan re-measures this.
- • in flight. Your pitch tracker keeps the timing, so a spot doesn't slip while you wait on an editor.
- • Each week we also flag what changed in AI's answers — first and foremost the day AI starts naming you, the win you're working toward. We also flag a new list citing rivals (your next fix) or a competitor that gained ground.
Re-checking which sources AI leans on — and whether you're on each — every week isn't realistic by hand.
No invented movement — only real re-scan findings.
Who AI recommends instead of you
share of voice
Of every business AI named across your prompts, who owns the mentions — the share of the conversation.
What this measures: your slice of all businesses AI mentions (you: ). What it is NOT: your score (how often AI names you — of answers), and not a source's citation count. Different pies — a smaller share here isn't a contradiction.
Each share is that business's slice of all the mentions AI made across your prompts this scan. It's a rough read from a sample — take it as "who dominates," not an exact market census.
You vs your top rival
head-to-head radar
"Beat the place down the street." You vs across the signals that matter.
How to read it: the bigger the shape, the more AI favors them over you.
No description captured for in this scan.
Your indigo shape is nearly a dot at the center: on all four signals you're close to zero right now. That's the real gap, not a chart glitch, and Named in AI answers is the axis that actually decides who gets recommended.
Positioning is a rough guide, not a precise score. On every axis your numbers come from your multi-sample appearance & coverage data, while rivals are measured from the answers we captured this scan — different methods, so compare the overall shape, not exact points.
Where AI gets its info
citation-influence by source
"Cited N×" = bar length, how often AI cited each source — a count, not your score. The dot beside each row is your standing there.
No captured answer named you alongside any source this scan, so your work is the amber rows (stand out where you're listed) and the rose rows (get listed) — see the fix pack below.
Excluded Google's grounding-redirect wrapper ( internal links, not a real publisher) — counting it would have inflated the top "source" several times over, so we subtract it to keep this honest.
AI already trusts these, and you're on them
These are the sources AI leaned on most for your prompts, and you're already listed on each — yet AI still surfaced rivals over you. Being on the list is your foot in the door — the win here is standing out, not getting added.
"Listed" means your business is on the publisher's page — a verifiable fact, different from "AI named you." In our captured answers AI cited these pages but didn't surface you, which is exactly the gap to close.
Your fix pack, biggest wins first
Ranked by leverage = how often AI leans on a source that lists rivals but leaves you out. Start at the top — fix #1 first.
Ready-to-paste outreach email
Being listed is a prerequisite for getting cited — not a guarantee of it. These are the highest-leverage places to be present; whether AI then surfaces you depends on how you stand out once you're there. The only honest proof a fix worked is a re-scan.
already lists you and cites you most (×) — so your lever there is standing out. The fixes below are net-new sources where rivals appear and you don't yet.
Green = you can do yourself today (claim or complete a listing); grey = editor-dependent — a pitch, not a guarantee. Directories you can self-add today; editorial pitches land when the site next refreshes — send them and move on.
More on how we ranked these ▾
This order is purely about AI visibility for your prompts — which sites AI cited when answering these specific searches. That can differ from a site's general value for winning customers; a directory that's huge for foot traffic may rank lower here if AI didn't lean on it for your prompts.
of fixes started — real progress you can see now, even while your score takes weeks to catch up.
"Cited N×" counts how many times AI pulled from a source across this scan's answers — a source can be cited more than once in one answer, so it's a relative influence rank, not a share of the answers.
Quick wins
Prompts where you surfaced in at least one sampled run — your most realistic places to climb first.
by
- ✅ Got listed on — AI leans on, now covered.
- ✉️ in flight to editors.
As you mark fixes pitched and live in Sources & Fixes, the work shows up here — a client-ready record of exactly what moved this week. Nothing logged yet.
Built from fixes you've actually worked — being listed is a presence fact; whether AI then names you is what the re-scan re-measures.
These fixes aren't specific to one assistant: AI tools read local recommendations off the same published best-of lists and directories, so getting onto them compounds across assistants. This scan measured (Premium adds , plus Copilot & Grok as they roll out).
Your client roster — one branded report and weekly digest per business, all under , never Get Picked AI. You run the scans and stay your client's single point of contact; they never see us. Each additional business is just +$15/mo — the kind of line item you fold into a retainer.
Agencies, restaurant groups, and other multi-location brands track every location here — each row is a real scan, so scores only appear once that location has been scanned. We never estimate a location we haven't measured.
"We scan the assistants that actually expose which local businesses they cite — ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews and Gemini, and Perplexity on Premium. We add Copilot & Grok the day they open up; anyone claiming to 'track' an engine that doesn't publish citations is guessing. The fixes here are the same signals every assistant reads, so the work compounds across all of them."
Yours to paste into a call recap or proposal — keeps you ahead of the question instead of caught by it.
- What we queried
- Each of local prompts, asked × on — AI answers, plus Google Maps lookups ( requests in all). Only the AI answers feed the score.
- How the score is computed
- The share of all sampled answers that named — of here, ≈ /100. Mention-share is your slice of every business AI listed (a different denominator).
- Scope & roadmap
- Free covers ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews & Gemini; Premium adds Perplexity. Copilot & Grok are on the roadmap, added the day they expose local citations. AI answers vary over time, so these figures are a snapshot of this scan, not a live or permanent ranking.
- Verifiable
- Every figure traces to an answer we captured and stored — open any heat-matrix cell to read the raw response yourself. Nothing here is asserted that you can't check.